Thursday, July 28, 2016

IoT Will Rely Heavily on Cognitive Support

The IoT alone shows great promise for simple signal sense and respond situations. IoT evens shows more promise when combined with fixed logic, either in a chip or circuit board. Combine it with dynamic software that can late bind conditional responses and the world for IoT grows exponentially. Now let's add speed, complexity and dynamic relationships. This is when IoT will need an even bigger assist to manage it optimally. IoT will generate enough big data to sort through that it will become mind and software boggling. Enter Cognitive support to extend the reach and influence of IoT. Let's dig into this gold mine for just a few nuggets.



IoT and Speed that Kills:

IoT works at speeds that are in the nano-second range thus leaving humans in the dust with response times. The obvious answer is to add firmware or software that can deal with speed. Unfortunately responses have to be governed by constraints and sometimes human intervention even if on exception, This puts limits on agility because the firmware and software can't change around changing contexts at warp speed. People can't deal with this either though they have the rationale to understand new contexts, constraints and trends.

IoT and Machine /Deep Learning:

Machine learning can help IoT by taking the new learning situations mined out of the big data generated by IoT and emerging situations to expand conditions and responses emerging from the real world. This takes time to teach and supervise deep learning technology to be effective. While learning and supervision intense in the beginning, incremental learning can be added quickly to leverage IoT in context.

IoT and Cognitive Computing:

With cognitive computing learning can be a great assist for the IoT in that cognitive can adapt at the speed of the IoT. Cognitive can understand the nuances of human language, process questions or patterns similar to the way people think and quickly mine vast amounts of data generated by the IoT. Most importantly, cognitive computing can learn from each interaction on it's own by-passing intense training by humans.

Net; Net:

IoT and Cognitive need each other in a good way. Combine cognitive computing and compound analytics with IoT and the reach of digital becomes mind boggling.


Additional Reading:

Cognitive 
Digital













Thursday, July 21, 2016

Introducing Digital Transformation Boot Camps

Going Digital is a hot topic these days and many folks at the "C" level are pondering where to start. There is a common fear that an "up start" in or bordering your industry will come in and disrupt your business. While that might not be likely in your industry, every organization is looking to have better customer engagement while becoming more operationally effective. Getting your hands around Digital is key for organizations going forward, so why not start today by understanding:

  • How can you convince your organization to go fully digital?
  • How do you align going digital with business outcomes?
  • Who should be leading your Digital Transformation efforts?
  • How can you improve your customer experience by going digital? Your selling process? Your marketing strategy?



To learn more, please watch the introduction video on this page 
To see the press announcement click here
To read more about digital transformation in general click here 

Net; Net:

Digital is too important not to invest in getting a great "jump start" I look forward to many a workshop with folks to help start or guide an existing effort. 





Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Leading Digital Transformation Efforts

There is no one simple answer to "Who should lead Digital Efforts?" I would like to dive into this question a bit in this short space to get the discussion going for those who have not dealt with this issue or for organizations looking to make a mid-course correction. Since only 10 - 15% of organizations would say that they are "digital" today and only 5% would say their customer experience is seamless and compelling, I think it's safe to say that this is still fertile ground to plant with digital leadership.  Let's explore the advantages of each typical role for leading digital efforts.



CEO (Chief Executive Officer):

With the CEO in charge things could get done quicker because of the span of influence and the desire to get all of the stove pipe business functions working together on behalf of the customers, stockholders, employees, partners and other parties. While this top down approach is great, the CEO is spread too thin to usually get this done unless it is a green field (new) company.


CIO (Chief Information Officer):

Since digital implies applying new and emerging technologies, who is better at dealing with technical issues? This might seem like the easy answer, but we have grown utility type CIOs over the past decade that are aimed at keeping the lights on and the costs low. This actually could be risky because the IT folks tend to slow things down, sorry to say. However, if you have a fresh visionary CIO with drive, this is a good place to start the proposals and govern forward.

CDO (Chief Digital Officer):

The CDO is a person who looks at the volatile and emerging digital space and helps guide an organization to apply the right technology to the right issues while softly guiding people change and legacy leverage. Since this is a full time endeavor, the focus is sharp. The issue come around working with the other leaders in a wise way to help them understand and implement change.


CMO (Chief Marketing Officer):

The marketing executive should be closest to the customer and since excellent customer engagement is the goal, this is a logical place to start. The CMO can easily take an "outside in: view of your organization, but the knowledge of how to apply technology successfully can be a real challenge

CSO (Chief Sales Officer):

Since digital is aimed at raising more revenue, a case can be made for have sales lead the digital effort. Since selling can have a short term mentality and typically does not know the technology either, the person has to be just the right one to balance the tug for immediate revenue.

COO (Chief Operating Officer):

Quite often the behavior an organizations' processes represent the organization to the outside world, a case can be made for the COO, who is aimed at effective and efficient operations. Since much of the funding for digital is likely to come from efficiency savings, a case can be made for this role.

Department Head: 

A visionary department head, who has fire in the belly, is often a good way to "sand box" initial digital efforts without the risk of large scale impact. Since the department head is not usually at the "C suite" level the effort becomes more difficult, but an up and coming "C" level person would be able to get it done. After a success, this person could rise to lead other digital efforts.

Net; Net:

Picking the right digital leader for the times is important and might change over the long scale of a digital journey. The key is setting up good governance and good measurements on expected outcomes. A separate governance body within the organization with the CEO at the head works well.

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

IBM is Building A Smart Digital Business Platform on the Cloud

IBM invited a group of analysts to New York for an update on their cloud strategy and the progress building their Digital Business Platform(DBP). The good news is that the technologies are coming together fast on the cloud. The bad news is that it isn't finished to a level of holistic business support yet, but the progress is showing. Like the digital journey itself, which is evolving as organizations learn, deliver and adjust, IBM is evolving their cloud platform while making portions usable now. IBM is doing the same for the business value built on top of it's cloud platform. While not complete yet, IBM was able to show significant progress and end use in a significant number of areas. IBMs' technical difference is that its platform scales, its global, its hybrid and it supports fast development through composition, hybrid languages and rapid method management.  IBM's business difference is delivering vertical solutions that are cognitively enabled on top of a "world class cloud" either by themselves or through close partners. IBM jammed almost two days worth of content into one day so we all drank from the fire hose. See IBM's general in charge, Robert LeBlanc, below along with IBM's target architecture chart.




There were a number of case studies, some presented by clients, showing the technical and business benefits of a dynamic scaling cloud platform, which is worthy of note in itself. However what differentiates IBM besides the technical platform is the leverage of cognitive components or services, which I like to call "cogs". Partners were able to demonstrate the value of cognitive assists in several business situations that delivered business results. IBM intends to show it's cognitive capabilities as it's advantage through making "cogs" consumable in their Bluemix development environment and by funding partners that can deliver vertical and horizontal cognitive solutions for clients digital journeys.  See a growing inventory of cogs in the image below: 


Noteworthy:

I was delighted with some of the vision on video content, IoT and cloud data management, but I was disappointed about not hearing more on their graph data base and digital transformation assistance. I wasn't clear on IBM's block chain stance, but they had a small "demo like" presentation. I think it's early though. We also had to chose one breakout session from a list of six great sessions. I hope to catch up on some of the sessions I had to miss because time constraints. 

Net; Net:

IBM is flexing it's cloud muscle now while it is growing and adapting. I'm hoping that the new approaches do not leave some of the early adopters behind. IBM is also starting to show it's cognitive prowess and I expect this to accelerate. What seems to be missing is a marketing name that catches fire in the market like IBMs competitors have done. To me it's always better to deliver the running architecture before the marketing, so I'm not as critical here. Make no mistake, IBM is not done delivering, but I like the results so far.
.

Thursday, June 23, 2016

Blog Activity for 2Q 2016

It's been a quarter of growth for a number of digital topics along with the consistent top topics of IoT, Analytics, Process and Digital Transformation related topics. Process Applications now leaped in the top tier of interest along with the Digital Maturity Model (DMM) and the Digital Business Platform (DBP). These topics have accelerated interest in the blog to the tune of 20K per month now.  Let's see if this is temporary or not. Traffic dropped of the chart from both China and Sweden. Traffic jumped quite a bit for France, Slovakia and Ireland.

 I just announced a new book and collaborated with the WFMC on "Best Practices for Knowledge Workers"                  You can buy either on Amazon .

                                                            TOP TIER TOPICS


















                          

                                                      Topics on the Rise 




























                                    Active Countries Other Than the US



Monday, June 20, 2016

Is Digital Transformation Better With Digital Identity?

While I find the definition of a digital identity cold and the idea of being known by some kind of serial number abhorrent, I question how effective the new digital world will be without some kind of verifiable and secure identity. I'd like to explore some of the benefits of having a digital identity for everyone and everything will help the digital age and transformation to it by following digital identity evolution over time.



The Wiki Definition is as Follows:


A digital identity is information on an entity used by computer systems to represent an external agent. That agent may be a person, organisation, application, or device. ISO/IEC 24760-1 defines identity as `set of attributes related to an entity'.



















Source: ForgeRock 


Enabling "The Outside in" Customer Experience:

Imagine if there were preferences of all your customers known and available to all organizations. Assuming that the customer could control the level of intimacy, organizations could actually know enough to delight an individual customer. This would be an additional level of usefulness beyond just customer journey analysis and could lead to behavior analysis to help customers of all types cope and lead to delight in many circumstances and moods. 

Sensing State Through Things: 

If all sensors, controllers, software and software agents would have a unique and standard identification, they could talk to each other and collaborate on decisions and work to support people organizations and things. As digital identity evolves things could dynamically collaborate and bid on work itself in an intelligent way guided by policies, rules and constraints. 

Sensing Context Through Relationships: 

As organizations, people and machines interact in patterned relationships, beneficial outcomes and relationships can emerge into better practices mined from real interactions over time. Patterns of success and possibility can tracked through emerging relationships and rules and constraints could merge for optimal performance over time. 

Security of  Identities:

One of the most crucial corner stones of a digital identity is air tight security. The identity and associations must be kept save and be unhackable. For people bio-metric authentication seems to be gathering steam, but it might require several methods to be foolproof. 

Secure Exchange within Relationships:

The banking industry along with government bodies are working towards free exchange through secure means. At the moment, Blockchain  looks real promising for very secure exchange that is almost unhackable by the nature of the number of computer cycles it takes within a short time frame. 

Net; Net:

As much as it bothers me, it seems that digital identity is eventual with all of it's blessing and potential for risk. I just hope they don't implant us with chips like the government has suggested. For digital to be truly successful we will be a secure and rich digital identity. 





Tuesday, June 14, 2016

Art for 2Q 2016

This quarter was mostly about experimentation, so I tried a bunch of new things. If you like any of it, let me know. I completed three paintings. One was for my friends that celebrated Passover 2016 and the other two were my first attempts with liquid acrylic paints. They are quite different for me in that my usual works are done in oil or water color. I also tried some 3D fractals as well as some of my typical fractals. I hope a few of these please your eyes :)  If not, maybe my art web sites might appeal.  "Purple Royalty"  placed in Art Takes Times Square 2016.

Web Presence:


                                          Rouge Rain




                                       Midnight Wonder 

                                                       


                                         Star of David 




                                             Cyclone




                                          Molten Planet



Purple Royalty 




Previous Quarters Pieces:

1Q 2016 click here 
4Q 2015 click here
3Q 2015 click here
2Q 2015 click here